If you've ever used an at-home genetic test, there is a chance your information is not as protected as you think it is. This week, California State Senator Tom Umberg introduced legislation to regulate the sharing of specimens collected through DNA analysis.
"What consumers don't know is the recipient of the specimen, those doing the analysis, may provide that to other entities," Umberg told Cheddar Friday. He said the new legislation will protect consumers and provide them the opportunity to make their own decisions about their data.
Illinois and New York have similar laws on the books. Illinois at the start of 2020 expanded protections for users of genetic testing kits like 23andMe and Ancestry.com
One of the concerns around the sharing of genetic testing is the disclosure of information that may have "health implications and insurance implications and maybe even employment implications," Umberg said. Tests can reveal a predisposition to a disease, information that, if sold to an entity like an insurance company, may affect the user beyond simply taking a test.
He said he became more concerned after the Department of Defense warned personnel not to use home DNA tests.
"If it's affecting national defense, I think consumers should know what's what that information is being used for," the legislator and retired U.S. Army colonel said.
The legislation Umberg introduced, California Senate Bill 980, provides for users to opt-in to letting companies pass on their information to third parties, like if the company offers some kind of compensation.
Arguments at the Supreme Court have concluded for the day as the justices consider President Donald Trump's sweeping unilateral tariffs in a trillion-dollar test of executive power.
AI is reshaping investigations. Longeye CEO Guillaume Delepine shares how their AI workspace empowers law enforcement to uncover insights faster and smarter.
Stephen Kates, Financial Analyst at Bankrate, joins to discuss the Fed’s 25-basis-point rate cut, inflation risks, and what it all means for consumers and marke
Big tech earnings take center stage as investors digest results from Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, Amazon, and Apple, with insights from Gil Luria of D.A. Davidson
Disney content has gone dark on YouTube TV, leaving subscribers of the Google-owned live streaming platform without access to major networks like ESPN and ABC. That’s because the companies have failed to reach a new licensing deal to keep Disney channels on YouTube TV. Depending on how long it lasts, the dispute could particularly impact coverage of U.S. college football matchups over the weekend — on top of other news and entertainment disruptions that have already arrived. In the meantime, YouTube TV subscribers who want to watch Disney channels could have little choice other than turning to the company’s own platforms, which come with their own price tags.
