A bipartisan coalition of state attorneys general on Wednesday filed an antitrust lawsuit against Facebook that accuses the tech giant of acquiring smaller companies to curb competition. 

More pointedly, the lawsuit seeks to force Facebook to divest from Instagram and WhatsApp, two of its highest-profile acquisitions over the last decade. 

"We want to see Facebook stop abusing its market power to prejudice consumers, competitors, and also third-party app and software developers," Connecticut Attorney General William Tong told Cheddar. "We want to see Facebook stop its practice of either buy-or-bury its competition and trying to crush anybody who threatens Facebook." 

Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg has pushed back against this characterization of its acquisitions, saying those companies would not have flourished without being purchased. 

Tong said this is irrelevant to what he sees as the anti-competitive intent behind the acquisitions. 

"The bottom line is that we believe that Facebook's strategy is to buy or bury," he said. "As Mark Zuckerberg said, he wants to create a competitive moat around Facebook, and he used that imagery himself, which means he wants Facebook to be impervious from competition."

This strategy of buying other companies to clear the market of competitors becomes more of a problem, and indeed possibly illegal, when a company has monopoly power, which Tong and the other attorneys general argue Facebook has over the social media market. 

"You could make an argument that you have some other choices," he said. "The fact is is that Facebook has a monopoly, and it is in a unique position to limit consumer choice." 

For the consumers, he added, this has meant a lack of choice and a lack of effective safeguards for personal data. 

One demand embedded in the lawsuit is that Facebook should be legally forced to notify the public when it's making an acquisition worth more than $10 million. 

"They should let us know, so that we have the opportunity to analyze that potential acquisition and take action if we think it's necessary in the public interest and in the interests of our states, and potentially to stop Facebook from making that acquisition," Tong said.

The tech giant now faces multiple legal challenges. On Wednesday, the Federal Trade Commission also filed a lawsuit against the company alleging anticompetitive conduct. 

"Facebook’s actions to entrench and maintain its monopoly deny consumers the benefits of competition," said Ian Conner, director of the agency's Bureau of Competition, in a statement. "Our aim is to roll back Facebook’s anticompetitive conduct and restore competition so that innovation and free competition can thrive."

Share:
More In Business
Klarna shares jump 30% on Wall Street debut
Swedish buy now, pay later company Klarna is making its highly anticipated public debut on the New York Stock Exchange Wednesday, the latest in a run of high-profile initial public offerings this year. The offering priced at $40 Tuesday, above the forecasted range of $35 to $37 a share, valuing the company at more than $15 billion. The valuation easily makes Klarna one of the biggest IPOs so far in 2025, which has been one of the busier years for companies going public. Other popular IPOs so far this year include the design software company Figma and Circle Internet Group, which issues the USDC stablecoin..
Musk loses crown as world’s richest to software giant Larry Ellison
Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison wrested the title of the world’s richest man from longtime holder Elon Musk early Wednesday as stock in his software giant rocketed more than a third in a stunning few minutes of trading. That is according to wealth tracker Bloomberg. A college dropout, the 81-year-old Ellison is now worth $393 billion, Bloomberg says, several billion more than Musk, who had been the world’s richest for four years. The switch in the ranking came after a blockbuster earnings report from Oracle. Forbes still has Musk as the richest, however, valuing his private businesses much higher.
Load More