Tesla Asks Suppliers For Refunds as it Struggles to Stem Cash Burn
Tesla responded to reports Monday that it asked suppliers to refund money already spent, saying the requests were made on ongoing, long-term projectsーnot on contracts that were already complete.
That response came in reaction to a Wall Street Journal story which sent shares down as much as 6.6 percent in early trade.
According to a memo obtained by the Journal, a global supply manager at Tesla asked for cash back on purchases from as long ago as 2016, saying refunds were necessary for the company to remain viable and to ensure both it and the parts maker could grow.
Tying the suppliers' fortunes in with Tesla's could help persuade them, said Tim Higgins, the technology and automotive reporter at the Wall Street Journal who broke the story, even if they feared renegotiating would set a bad precedent.
"If you're concerned about a company going forward, you want to help them make it through a difficult patch. There's also the idea of, well, maybe there's bigger business down the road. Those sorts of inputs go into the calculation," Higgins said in an interview with Cheddar.
Tesla's attempt to get price cuts demonstrates the company's tenuous position as it looks to ramp up production, especially of its latest Model 3, in the face of a dwindling cash stockpile. Hitting a sustained production rate of 5,000 of those vehicles a week ー a goal the company met for the first time in the last week of the second quarter ー is seen as crucial for eventually helping the company become cash flow positive.
CEO Elon Musk has said the company won't need to raise more funds, but Tesla has been burning through about a billion dollars in cash a quarter and, at the end of March, had $2.7 billion left on its balance sheet.
Cash flow will be the focus of Tesla's second quarter earnings on August 1.
"Analysts almost universally agree that Tesla's going to need to raise more money and likely has the ability to do it," said Higgins. "It's that the CEO doesn't want to do it, and that is creating some of the pressure here."
For the full interview, [click here](https://cheddar.com/videos/teslas-showing-signs-of-desperation).
Disney content has gone dark on YouTube TV, leaving subscribers of the Google-owned live streaming platform without access to major networks like ESPN and ABC. That’s because the companies have failed to reach a new licensing deal to keep Disney channels on YouTube TV. Depending on how long it lasts, the dispute could particularly impact coverage of U.S. college football matchups over the weekend — on top of other news and entertainment disruptions that have already arrived. In the meantime, YouTube TV subscribers who want to watch Disney channels could have little choice other than turning to the company’s own platforms, which come with their own price tags.
President Donald Trump said he has decided to lower his combined tariff rates on imports of Chinese goods to 47% after talks with Chinese leader Xi Jinping on curbing fentanyl trafficking.
Universal Music Group and AI platform Udio have settled a copyright lawsuit and will collaborate on a new music creation and streaming platform. The companies announced on Wednesday that they reached a compensatory legal settlement and new licensing agreements. These agreements aim to provide more revenue opportunities for Universal's artists and songwriters. The rise of AI song generation tools like Udio has disrupted the music streaming industry, leading to accusations from record labels. This deal marks the first since Universal and others sued Udio and Suno last year. Financial terms of the settlement weren't disclosed.
Nvidia on Wednesday became the first public company to reach a market capitalization of $5 trillion. The ravenous appetite for the Silicon Valley company’s chips is the main reason that the company’s stock price has increased so rapidly since early 2023.
